The IRS released Revenue Ruling 2019-24 last week, in a (rare) move to provide sane guidance concerning the handling of certain crypto transactions, specifically, hard forks and those followed by airdrops. The full text of the Ruling may be downloaded here.
I received an envelope today from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration in Sacramento. This was not a window envelope, but rather a heavy stock (20lb? 24lb?), security envelope (you know, with the blue hashed printing so one cannot easily discern what’s inside), bulk mailed under USPS permit number 569. I don’t get all that much mail from California, but as we do handle clients all over the country and abroad, it wasn’t that unusual.
Inside the envelope was a letter-sized (well, 11×17, folded to form a booklet) 4-page, full color newsletter, entitled, NEWS FOR TAX PRACTITIONERS (Publication 542, August 2019, Edition 10). This is apparently a semi-annual newsletter for tax professionals. Who knew?
Before I get to the Sales Tax reminder (hint: think the Wayfair decision), I was struck by the apparent cost of the mailing of this information. First, the zeitgeist is that we should never print anything unless absolutely necessary (because trees won’t regrow or that paper isn’t biodegradable or some such justification). Not that I’m all that crazy about having more paper to handle, but that’s not my point. So, here I had in my hands a full color, moderately-heavy-stock newsletter entirely lacking in personal information to be kept private, mailed in a heavy-stock, custom printed security envelope, sent from a state reportedly having financial difficulties. It boggles the mind.
Please, people, lobby your elected officials to stop wasting your hard earned money. Of course, it’s easy to waste taxpayer money when all you need to do is increase the tax rate to cover the expense. So it goes.
PS – I did not knowingly subscribe to this mailing.
Now, as for the Sales Tax reminder: In April, with the signing of Assembly Bill No. 147, California joined the growing group of states which now impose the collection of Sales Tax on out-of-state retailers selling over the internet and delivering into the state. In the case of California, the threshold is $500,000 of sales within the State, with no minimum number of transactions required, and effective April 1, 2019 (district tax collection became effective April 25, 2019). See this page for specifics.
There is some relief afforded “marketplace sellers” using fulfillment centers located in-State. See this page for details, under Special Notices – 2019, July postings.
To determine whether any or all of your sales into the state of California are subject to the collection of Sales Tax, you might want to review the current California statutes.
While most legal fees relating to personal matters are non-deductible (or no longer deductible), IRC Section 62(a) provides for a deduction for attorneys fees in civil rights & whistle blower cases as a write-in deduction on Line 36 of Form 1040, before AGI.
Be sure to bring to your tax preparer’s attention any such legal fees which you have paid during the tax year in order to properly report them and take the deduction to which you are entitled.
Contemplating an investment in some energy-efficient equipment but unsure as to what tax incentives may be available in your state? The N.C. Clean Energy Technology Center at N.C. State University, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, maintains DSIRE, the Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency.
Simply visit the link above and enter your zip code to get a list of potential incentives available in your area.
The 2017 Tax Extender Bill was passed on February 9, resurrecting no less than 32 provisions which were to have sunset December 31, 2016. In fact, a number of these provisions would/could have impacted 2017 tax planning, had they been been taken up in a timely manner, but so it goes. Nevertheless, there are some important points to bear in mind for this tax season.
This will probably morph into a series of brief posts about cryptocurrency and how to handle it from a business and tax perspective. Most of us are still working through the maze, and of course, the tax landscape continues to shift beneath our feet. This article has been written post-signing of H.R.1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, signed into law in December, 2017.
A recent article in the CPA Practice Advisor cites a study of 2,234 people, conducted by “audio branding specialist” (whatever that means exactly) PH Media Group, which concludes that less than 24% of Americans who contact their accountants via telephone are satisfied with the manner in which their calls are handled. The article goes on to infer that as a result, accounting firms score an F in the area of phone skills this post.
It seems that each year, criminals become emboldened by their past successes, and 2016 is no exception to that rule. While not at the top of this year’s <a href="https://www singulair generic.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/IRS-Wraps-Up-the-Dirty-Dozen-List-of-Tax-Scams-for-2016″ target=”_blank”>IRS Dirty Dozen list of tax scams, phone scams are certainly toward the top of ours.
The allure of being your own boss is a strong pull for many to escape the traditional demands of a regular job. Recently, app-oriented companies (such as Uber, Washio, Postmates, Shyp, and others) have become popular ways for non-capitalized erstwhile entrepreneurs to enter the wide world of self-employment.
Payroll services are great assets. As compliance becomes more and more a full time job, outsourcing this task to experienced providers has become a popular alternative to handling such matters in-house. A single penalty for a missed tax deposit can far exceed the cost of a good payroll service for an entire year.
Complications do arise, however, such as when starting up, switching from in-house to a provider, changing providers mid-year, or terminating a business mid-quarter or before W-2 season.
We recently had a situation where a client sold his business assets (but no the business). As his business entity no longer had payroll, he contacted the payroll provider to terminate his account (with no payroll to process and no income from further operations, it seemed a logical choice). Unfortunately, that left the final quarter’s payroll tax reporting undone, and us (as the accountants preparing the general ledger) unable to access his payroll data online.
While we can’t blame the service provider per se (the provider is not paid to maintain the data in the online portal or to provide any services whatsoever after the account is closed), the issue is that many clients seem to forget that even though payroll may have stopped after the first week of the payroll quarter, payroll returns will still be due following the end of the quarter, and year-end reports (Federal Form 940, at a minimum) and W-2’s (and W-3) will also be due the following January.
Most payroll service providers will require their clients to maintain accounts (even if no current payroll is being generated) for a nominal fee in order to prepare the quarterly and year-end reports, as well as the W-2’s, and clients should expect to likely pay a la carte for such reporting services, even if they were previously accustomed to a package deal (unless the provider offers a similar package for inactive employers).
As always, communication is key. In the case above, because we have an ongoing relationship with the payroll provider, we were able to obtain the reports necessary and get the dialog moving (again) between our client and the payroll provider to ensure that the reports will indeed be prepared for this year, and to obtain the data we needed to prepare the general ledger work in a timely fashion. It may be easy to mentally separate the roles of accountant and payroll service provider, but in truth, we both work together, complimenting each other’s service offerings, and a good accountant will strive to maintain a good rapport with the service provider to minimize the impact on the client of procedural and administrative matters.